Draft prototype for feedback. Not for circulation. Figures are modelled from IDA FY25 inputs, in SDR million.

IDA's performance-based allocation (PBA) shares the IDA envelope across countries using CPR3 × GNI per capita−0.125 × population, plus a base allocation per country and FCV allocations. Adjust the formula to see who gains and loses compared with the FY25 formula, holding the total envelope and FCV allocations fixed.

More negative = more towards poorer countries. FY25: −0.125
Higher = more weight on performance rating. FY25: 3
SDR million per year. FY25: 15
Countries at or above this receive no allocation (including base and FCV). FY25: none

Who gains and who loses

Compare against
Show change as

Change compared with the FY25 formula. Hover or tap a point for details. Each point is a country.

Biggest gainers and losers

How well does the allocation track poverty?

Correlation (Pearson) between allocation per person and the share of people living below $3 a day, across all countries. Higher means allocations per person are more concentrated where poverty rates are high.

Correlation of allocation per person with poverty rate
Allocation measureFY25 formulaYour settingsChange

"Formula only" is the performance-based portion; "+ base" adds the base allocation; "+ FCV" adds FCV allocations. Countries excluded by a cutoff count as zero. Poverty rates are World Bank PIP nowcasts (2021 PPP), which for some countries extrapolate from old surveys.

All countries

Allocation by country under the FY25 formula and your settings, SDR million

SDR million. FY25 allocations are as modelled from the published FY25 inputs and match the published allocations to within rounding. Excludes Eritrea and Zimbabwe (non-accrual), Syria (no data) and Myanmar (ad hoc adjustment). Pakistan is capped at 6.88% of the total.